CTAL-ATT 考試範圍廣、題型靈活,不少考生第一次應考都低估了它的難度。KaoGuTi 的 ISQI ISTQB Advanced Level Agile Technical Tester 題庫依據最新考試內容整理 100 道模擬試題,幫你提前熟悉出題方式。
ISQI CTAL-ATT 考試概覽:
| 認證廠商: | ISTQB |
|---|---|
| 考試名稱: | ISTQB 高階級敏捷技術測試人員 |
| 考試代碼: | CTAL-ATT |
| 考試形式: | 選擇題 |
| 相關認證: | ISTQB 敏捷測試人員基礎級認證(CTFL-AT) ISTQB 軟體測試人員基礎級認證(CTFL) |
| 支援語言: | 英語 |
| 實際考試題數: | 40-45 |
| 考試費用: | 249 美元 |
| 考試時間: | 90-120 |
| 證照有效期限: | 終身有效 |
| 及格分數: | 65% |
| 範例考題: | ![]() |
| 考試方式: | 可選擇線上遠端監考測驗或於認可考場應試。 |
| 必備條件: | 須具備 ISTQB 軟體測試人員基礎級認證(CTFL)。 |
| 官方大綱網址: | https://istqb.org/certifications/ |
ISQI CTAL-ATT 考試大綱主題:
| 章節 | 權重 | 目標 |
|---|---|---|
| 敏捷測試基礎知識 | 15-20% | - 敏捷軟體開發
|
| 以風險為導向的敏捷測試 | 15-25% | - 風險緩解
|
| 敏捷測試自動化與 CI/CD | 20-30% | - 測試工具
|
| 技術測試實務 | 30-40% | - 靜態與動態測試
|
關於 CTAL-ATT 考試,考生最常問的問題
CTAL-ATT 是由 ISTQB 推出的認證考試,正式名稱為「ISTQB 高階級敏捷技術測試人員」,通過後即可取得 Agile Technical Tester 認證。此認證屬於 高階級 等級,主要用來驗證考生在相關技術領域的專業能力,對求職與升遷都有實質幫助。與本考試相關的認證還包括 ISTQB 軟體測試人員基礎級認證(CTFL)、ISTQB 敏捷測試人員基礎級認證(CTFL-AT),可依個人職涯規劃逐步進修。若你正準備報考 CTAL-ATT,KaoGuTi 的練習題能幫助你更快掌握考試重點。
CTAL-ATT 考試的題量為 40-45 題,考試時間為 90-120。在有限的作答時間內,每題能停留的時間其實不多,答題節奏的掌握格外重要。建議作答時不要在單一題目上糾結過久,遇到不確定的題目先標記起來,全部答完再回頭檢查。考前不妨使用 KaoGuTi 的模擬試題進行幾次限時練習,實際體驗在 90-120 內完成作答的節奏感,正式上場時時間分配會更有把握。
CTAL-ATT 考試的及格分數為 65%,官方報名費為 249 美元。需要留意的是,若未能一次通過,重考必須再次全額支付報名費,加上等待與重新準備的時間,成本其實不低。建議正式報名前,先以 KaoGuTi 的 100 道練習題完整自我檢測,確認答題表現穩定超過及格標準後再預約考試,避免不必要的重考支出。
須具備 ISTQB 軟體測試人員基礎級認證(CTFL)。 報考條件可能隨官方政策調整,建議報名前再到 ISQI 官方考試頁面 確認最新規定,以免錯過任何變更。
可以。KaoGuTi 提供 CTAL-ATT 免費範例試題(Free PDF Demo),內容取自正式題庫,下載後即可實際檢視題目與答案解析的品質,滿意再購買。購買正式版後享有 365 天免費更新,題庫內容會隨考綱調整同步修訂;365 天到期後如需繼續更新,還可享有 50% 的續更折扣。
KaoGuTi 提供退款保證:購買後 60 天內參加 CTAL-ATT 對應考試而未通過,可申請全額退款。申請時需提交報名證明(准考證/enrollment slip)複印件與官方成績單(Score Report)PDF,並於考後 2 天內提出,我們會在 7 天內處理完成。請注意,購買後 3 天內即參加考試、已下載但未實際應考、免費資料與過期訂單均不適用退款保證,且考生姓名須與付款人姓名一致。若不想退款,也可以選擇免費更換為兩個等值考試資料,並保留原購產品的更新服務。
交付方面,付款完成後系統會在一分鐘內將產品下載連結寄至你的電子郵件信箱,可立即下載開始準備;若 2 小時內未收到,請聯絡客服協助處理。產品不限制安裝的電腦數量,桌機、筆電都能自由使用。
CTAL-ATT 考試大綱共分為 4 個主要領域,包括:
- 技術測試實務(佔比 30-40%)
- 以風險為導向的敏捷測試(佔比 15-25%)
- 敏捷測試自動化與 CI/CD(佔比 20-30%)
完整的大綱內容與各領域細項,請參考本頁上方的考試大綱區塊,建議逐條對照自己的熟悉程度,安排複習的優先順序。
最新的 Agile Technical Tester CTAL-ATT 免費考試真題:
問題 #1
A developer has implemented a class that calculates if a given date is a leap year. The definition for the leap year is given:
Every year that is exactly divisible by four is a leap year, except for years that are exactly divisible by 100, but these centurial years are leap years if they are exactly divisible by 400.
- divisible by 4
- but not by 100
- years divisible by 400 are leap anyway
You have already thought about it and started with the first test class; the test class looks like (pseudo JavaScript used here):
// LeapYear.spec.js
describe('Leap year calculator', () => {
it('should consider 1996 as leap', () => {
expect(LeapYear.isLeap(1996)).toBe(true);
});
});
What would now be your next step to proceed as efficient as possible, to validate the correctness of the class above?
A. First write code that makes this test case pass
B. First write additional test classes to test also other relevant aspects of the leap year calculation
C. First write code that makes this test case fail
D. First write code that covers other relevant aspects of the leap year calculation
問題 #2
An increased proportion of automated test coverage often leads to a greater degree of manual testing that follows reactive strategies, because:
A. If the proportion of automated tests increases, manual tests focus on the riskiest areas which are identified reactively
B. An increase of the proportion of automated test increases test coverage, and the uncovered areas are to be tested reactively
C. Many of the tests that can be prepared upfront, will be automated which enables the testers to spend more time for execution of manual tests
D. Reactive strategies consider the current context and status of the project and the system under test. To be able to adopt to this status most flexible a greater degree of manual testing is necessary
問題 #3
You have been working as a tester in an Agile team You have found that the user stories are being defined by the team but it is still unclear what will be a successful outcome Even after story elaboration you are still unclear as to what a story should do As a result, you're not really sure what to test or to know when you'll be done with testing This problem is becoming worse as completed stories are showcased but the product owner is unhappy with the results You've looked into the matter further and the comments from the product owner indicate that features are missing from the stories. The story is functioning correctly within the limited definition of the story but the product owner is expecting more functionality, such as error handling that isn't being defined in the story What technique should you implement that would help to further define the product owner's expectations and alleviate the issues that are arising during the show cases?
A. A combination of TDD and BDD by the team to improve the pre-build testing
B. BDD by the developers when unit tests are being created
C. ATDD by the team to better define the requirements
D. TDD by the developers before they begin coding
問題 #4
which statement about test automation is TRUE?
SELECT ONE OPTION
A. When continuous deployment is fully implemented there will be no need for manual testing
B. Test automation will increase the intervals at which continuous deployment to production can be achieved
C. When continuous deployment is fully implemented it will be necessary to automate only unit and integration tests
D. Test automation levels can be influenced by and can constrain the frequency of code deployments
問題 #5
The following epic has been written:
As a vehicle driver
I want to find an available space In a car park
So that I can pay in advance to reserve that space
This epic will be used to develop user stories for a new National Car Parking application Both public and private car park owners will be able to utilise the system, allowing drivers of all kinds to guarantee an available car parking space on arrival at their chosen car park, according to the kind of vehicle that they may drive There will be multiple stakeholders including different car park owners, different user groups including disabled drivers and different vehicle types such as car. van and motorbike.
From this epic, multiple user stories will be written. The following acceptance criteria have been written for the epic, and will be applicable to all user stories (each user story will also have its own acceptance cntena):
1.End-to-end response time for any individual request submitted by a user must not exceed 5 seconds
2.All correspondence with stakeholders must be via email and text message
3.The application must be accessible on most mobile technology
4.A user cannot submit a form unless all mandatory fields are entered
5.Payment method can be made using the most popular electronic options
Applying the INVEST technique to this epic, including its acceptance criteria, which of the following statements is correct?
SELECT ONE OPTION
A. The Independent and Small criteria of INVEST have not been satisfied
B. The invest criteria have all been satisfied by this epic
C. The Testable and Small criteria of INVEST have not been satisfied
D. The Testable and Valuable criteria of INVEST have not been satisfied
問題與答案:
| 問題 #1 答案: A | 問題 #2 答案: D | 問題 #3 答案: C | 問題 #4 答案: D | 問題 #5 答案: A |

1179 位客戶反饋 







27.246.64.* -
我已经通過了 CTAL-ATT 考试拿到了证书。現在的我有一份很好的工作,是因為有 KaoGuTi 網站的幫助,谢谢!